Replying to @pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Pretty easy to make bullets tbh. And honestly I’m pro-gun. Arm the homeless. Arm trans people. Arm migrants.

Replying to @pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Pretty easy to make bullets tbh. And honestly I’m pro-gun. Arm the homeless. Arm trans people. Arm migrants.
Replying to @BCsven@lemmy.ca
They’re incredibly arbitrary. Each of them can just be collapsed into “acts of service” an act of service can be a gift, quality time is something that happens alongside the others (and is also something that can be described as a gift) and physical touch is (or should be) quality time.
It was made up by an american pastor to gaslight women, it doesn’t have any basis beyond what he felt like. He made up arbitrary categories that would help him sell his spiel about women listening to men.
Ive made a new category; Being nice. It takes all the other categories. The love languages are now: Being nice.
Replying to @Dagobah@lemmy.world
would of literally their
Replying to @expletivedeleted@lemmy.zip
Sure thing boss
Replying to @expletivedeleted@lemmy.zip
Whatever you say pal
Rough to just start them off with Kapital, dont you think?
Replying to @expletivedeleted@lemmy.zip
The book written by an aristocratic rapist snitch about how common people are just too stupid to take care of themselves?
Replying to @expletivedeleted@lemmy.zip
calling you a paper tiger
Yeah, that’s called projecting, bud
Replying to @curious_beetle@lemmy.ml
I’d honestly probably start with Lenin. Or at least not the Manifesto if you want anything more than, well, a Manifesto. If you wanna start with Marx/Engels then I would say Engels “On Authority” might be a good place to start. Or perhaps “The 18th brumaire of Louis Napoleon” by Marx.
Replying to @t3rmit3@beehaw.org
Fair point.
Replying to @t3rmit3@beehaw.org
To have a conversation? To get further insight into how a person thinks? To gain understanding? To talk about the ideological framework through which the person views the world, and hopefully gain some perspective out of that talk?
Replying to @southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
The drawback to a pack of dogs is the food consumption. In a nuclear apocalypse rationing is going to be difficult already, maintaining stores of kibble or other dogfeed for a whole pack would be a real burden.
If its not nuclear then I guess there’s enough protein to go around.
Id probably try to keep some horses too, if food and drink isn’t a worry. Maybe goats too, but now we’re going into animal husbandry